Singing the YouTube Blues

by Bina Shah    /  June 25, 2013  / 2 Comments

With YouTube already banned, Pakistan demands Google filter blasphemous and pornographic content—or else.

Pakistan Google Ban 4

The threat of a Google ban looms over Pakistan in the wake of an ongoing oust of YouTube. Photo via YouTube

As of today in Pakistan, despite the change in government with our recent elections, the six-month ban on YouTube continues, and there are few signs that anything is really going to change.

  1. Pakistan is a country of contradictions – full of promise for growth, modernity and progress, yet shrouded by political, social and cultural issues that undermine its quest for identity and integrity. My bi-monthly column “Pakistan Unveiled” presents stories that showcase the Pakistani struggle for freedom of expression, an end to censorship, and a more open and balanced society.
  2. Bina Shah is a Karachi-based journalist and fiction writer and has taught writing at the university level. She is the author of four novels and two collections of short stories. She is a columnist for two major English-language newspapers in Pakistan, The Dawn and The Express Tribune, and she has contributed to international newspapers including The Independent, The Guardian, and The International Herald Tribune. She is an alumnus of the International Writers Workshop (IWP 2011).

On Anusha Rahman‘s first day in office, the recently appointed Minister of State for IT and Telecommunications stated that the government was going to look into lifting the YouTube ban as soon as Google developed a proper filtration system for blocking blasphemous and pornographic content. Rahman then created a mini-tempest in the Twitter teapot when she announced that she had a plan to influence Google to comply with this request: “It all depends on our negotiation clout,” she said. “If they persist with their stance, we can block Google as a last resort…there are many alternative search engines on the Net.”

No sooner had she said this than howls of protest rose up from Pakistanis on Twitter and Facebook. Most berated Rahman for not realizing that Google was not just a search engine, but the largest search engine in the world. Not to mention the fact that Google is the provider of numerous Web applications, including email, data storage, and blogging platforms, as well as the base for Android smartphones, which are increasingly popular in Pakistan. It would be a huge blow to society even if the government only impeded access to Gmail. How could the Minister of IT and Telecommunications not realize the enormously detrimental effect that blocking all of Google would have on Pakistan’s economy?

However, social media users are unaware of how the process of blocking and unblocking sites like YouTube works in the corridors of Pakistan’s bureaucracy. To find out about this, I spoke to Afia Salam, a media consultant and journalist who is active on social media, about the ban.

“People seem to think it’s just a matter of turning on and off a switch, but it isn’t. Nor is the PTA (Pakistan Telecommunications Authority) responsible for blocking YouTube. Actually, the foreign ministries of both governments have to sign an MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) on the issue of unblocking YouTube. The IT ministry can’t do that.”

It’s unfortunate that in Pakistan, as in so many other countries, the wheels of bureaucracy turn exceedingly slow. Rahman said that she would take up the cause of unblocking YouTube after ministry personnel made an official presentation to her on the issue (there has been no word on whether said presentation actually took place). But the FES-PK Asia Media Barometer 2012 report says that it isn’t going to be as simple as that: It’s a problem of “finding out who blocks Internet Web sites in Pakistan.” According to the report, the PTA “claims an inter-ministerial committee was behind the blockade of popular services such as YouTube and Facebook. But despite repeated written requests by the public to PTA and parliament, information regarding the members of this committee was not released.”

With this level of confusion about the mechanism through which YouTube can be unblocked in Pakistan, it’s no wonder people are so upset. I’ve heard rumblings about how it suits the government to have YouTube blocked because Pakistanis no longer have access to alternative news reports and video clips from whistle-blowers. But most Pakistanis are upset about the YouTube ban, not just because it violates freedom of expression, but because we no longer have access to our entertainment—music videos, Game of Thrones clips, footage of cats sleeping in boxes—or other sources of information—lectures from international universities, Ted Talks, and instructional videos on a variety of topics, including Islam.

As for me, if the Minister of State goes ahead and blocks Google, rendering my Android phone useless, I’ll be sending her the bill.

About the Author

Bina Shah is a Karachi-based journalist and fiction writer and has taught writing at the university level. She is the author of four novels and two collections of short stories. She is a columnist for two major English-language newspapers in Pakistan, The Dawn and The Express Tribune, and she has contributed to international newspapers including The Independent, The Guardian, and The International Herald Tribune. She is an alumnus of the International Writers Workshop (IWP 2011).

View all articles by Bina Shah

2 Comments on "Singing the YouTube Blues"

  1. Syed Shah June 25, 2013 at 1:06 pm ·

    “Blocking” – is really the mindset of bureaucracy/establishment ….sec 144 ban.

    don’t know how china, Iran etc block content on you tube and web, but then again their people don’t react like Pakis. Pakistan should come up with something similar very soon and allow people access to information and content which is their right.

  2. Rizwan Ali June 26, 2013 at 2:51 am ·

    Let the confusion, irresponsibility and lack of ‘knowledge and understanding’ prevail on the part of the government and We will all get habitual to finding shortcuts and ‘other’ ways to get to what we want.

    By the way, when was the last time our government thought about the common man’s interest?

Leave a Comment

comm comm comm

Fearless, Ink.